Who is Occam razor?
Occam's razor (or Ockham's razor)
is a principle from philosophy. Suppose there exist two explanations
for an occurrence. In this case the one that requires the least
speculation is usually better. Another way of saying it is that the more
assumptions you have to make, the more unlikely an explanation.
If we cannot provide food and housing for people in our own country the way that Earth has provided for us, than Earth will evict you. This simple understanding manifests itself, global warming is not a concept as whether or not belief in Planets being alive is not the concept, the practical understanding is that Mother Nature conducts herself as life itself to us as Human Beings. Without that than our participation in the Milky Way Galaxy would be in a void. This is not in need of a mathematical figure as the computer and men smarter than I can input the data and realize with numbers how much is gone to date. People perhaps cannot comprehend this simplicity however perhaps the land owner can comprehend its complications. To engage in rent as a land owner would Earth detail your character of ownership as land is a precious commodity.
Perhaps the kindness of any Earth would have welcomed human beings as demonstrated by the ice that people have experimented with to discover that the ice performs to music by demonstrating it's truth by picture. However the simplicity of food and housing is not ice to engage question, the fact is that Earth provides for our requirements as basic life forms. I implore that people begin to comprehend the depth of what Earth must sustain. I implore once more that food and housing is necessary for our growth as human beings and as Earth has been kind in provision for free, we as her tenants should follow suit.
The effect of this being said as Occam's Razor is not required belief in heaven or hell, or any other state of reserve, the fact lends itself to only one point as the void does exist just as your conscious does or as energy is life itself, or should I say life, it's Self. Prompting prone to understanding depth vs. dimension or the science thereof. Conscious energy magnified at the human being makes memory, can you imagine being in the shape of condition that you are all currently in as human beings as is, and then (sp) as a segment of energy in dead Space? Ouch, as it would not be the shape of water, it would be the shape of human beings, can you imagine memory full-bore and you in the shape exact that you are in demonstrating what we as the people, really its more like NASA has been able to show us in this video. Yikes!! Imagine that you cannot evolve as you already have, now imagine energy both negative and positive and just know who would hit Earth first as construction is not chaos and provisions are not negative as Earth has no contract to her land of provisions and yet Mars is a dead planet, the Planet Mercury has extreme temperature fluctuations, hmm, Earth before Mercury makes Occam's Razor not a theory. There is the ability to comprehend Earth and her provisions, therefore people can understand the Vegan, the Carnivore, the Anchor, the chore.
Scientific consensus: Earth's climate is warming
AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC SOCIETIES
Statement on climate change from 18 scientific associations
"Observations throughout the world make it clear that climate change is occurring, and rigorous scientific research demonstrates that the greenhouse gases emitted by human activities are the primary driver." (2009)2-
American Association for the Advancement of Science"The scientific evidence is clear: global climate change caused by human activities is occurring now, and it is a growing threat to society." (2006)3 -
American Chemical Society"Comprehensive scientific assessments of our current and potential future climates clearly indicate that climate change is real, largely attributable to emissions from human activities, and potentially a very serious problem." (2004)4 -
American Geophysical Union"Human‐induced climate change requires urgent action. Humanity is the major influence on the global climate change observed over the past 50 years. Rapid societal responses can significantly lessen negative outcomes." (Adopted 2003, revised and reaffirmed 2007, 2012, 2013)5 -
American Medical Association"Our AMA ... supports the findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s fourth assessment report and concurs with the scientific consensus that the Earth is undergoing adverse global climate change and that anthropogenic contributions are significant." (2013)6 -
American Meteorological Society"It is clear from extensive scientific evidence that the dominant cause of the rapid change in climate of the past half century is human-induced increases in the amount of atmospheric greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide (CO2), chlorofluorocarbons, methane, and nitrous oxide." (2012)7 -
American Physical Society"The evidence is incontrovertible: Global warming is occurring. If no mitigating actions are taken, significant disruptions in the Earth’s physical and ecological systems, social systems, security and human health are likely to occur. We must reduce emissions of greenhouse gases beginning now." (2007)8 -
The Geological Society of America"The Geological Society of America (GSA) concurs with assessments by the National Academies of Science (2005), the National Research Council (2006), and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2007) that global climate has warmed and that human activities (mainly greenhouse‐gas emissions) account for most of the warming since the middle 1900s." (2006; revised 2010)9
SCIENCE ACADEMIES
International academies: Joint statement
"Climate change is real. There will always be uncertainty in understanding a system as complex as the world’s climate. However there is now strong evidence that significant global warming is occurring. The evidence comes from direct measurements of rising surface air temperatures and subsurface ocean temperatures and from phenomena such as increases in average global sea levels, retreating glaciers, and changes to many physical and biological systems. It is likely that most of the warming in recent decades can be attributed to human activities (IPCC 2001)." (2005, 11 international science academies)10-
U.S. National Academy of Sciences"The scientific understanding of climate change is now sufficiently clear to justify taking steps to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere." (2005)11
U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
-
U.S. Global Change Research Program"The global warming of the past 50 years is due primarily to human-induced increases in heat-trapping gases. Human 'fingerprints' also have been identified in many other aspects of the climate system, including changes in ocean heat content, precipitation, atmospheric moisture, and Arctic sea ice." (2009, 13 U.S. government departments and agencies)12
INTERGOVERNMENTAL BODIES
-
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change“Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, and since the 1950s, many of the observed changes are unprecedented over decades to millennia. The atmosphere and ocean have warmed, the amounts of snow and ice have diminished, and sea level has risen.”13
“Human influence on the climate system is clear, and recent anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases are the highest in history. Recent climate changes have had widespread impacts on human and natural systems.”14
OTHER RESOURCES
List of worldwide scientific organizations
The following page lists the nearly 200 worldwide scientific organizations that hold the position that climate change has been caused by human action.http://www.opr.ca.gov/facts/list-of-scientific-organizations.html
U.S. agencies
The following page contains information on what federal agencies are doing to adapt to climate change.https://www.c2es.org/site/assets/uploads/2012/02/climate-change-adaptation-what-federal-agencies-are-doing.pdf
*Technically, a “consensus” is a general agreement of opinion, but the scientific method steers us away from this to an objective framework. In science, facts or observations are explained by a hypothesis (a statement of a possible explanation for some natural phenomenon), which can then be tested and retested until it is refuted (or disproved).
As scientists gather more observations, they will build off one explanation and add details to complete the picture. Eventually, a group of hypotheses might be integrated and generalized into a scientific theory, a scientifically acceptable general principle or body of principles offered to explain phenomena.
References
- J. Cook, et al, "Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming," Environmental Research Letters Vol. 11 No. 4, (13 April 2016); DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002
Quotation from page 6: "The number of papers rejecting AGW [Anthropogenic, or human-caused, Global Warming] is a miniscule proportion of the published research, with the percentage slightly decreasing over time. Among papers expressing a position on AGW, an overwhelming percentage (97.2% based on self-ratings, 97.1% based on abstract ratings) endorses the scientific consensus on AGW.”
J. Cook, et al, "Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature," Environmental Research Letters Vol. 8 No. 2, (15 May 2013); DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024
Quotation from page 3: "Among abstracts that expressed a position on AGW, 97.1% endorsed the scientific consensus. Among scientists who expressed a position on AGW in their abstract, 98.4% endorsed the consensus.”
W. R. L. Anderegg, “Expert Credibility in Climate Change,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Vol. 107 No. 27, 12107-12109 (21 June 2010); DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1003187107.
P. T. Doran & M. K. Zimmerman, "Examining the Scientific Consensus on Climate Change," Eos Transactions American Geophysical Union Vol. 90 Issue 3 (2009), 22; DOI: 10.1029/2009EO030002.
N. Oreskes, “Beyond the Ivory Tower: The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change,” Science Vol. 306 no. 5702, p. 1686 (3 December 2004); DOI: 10.1126/science.1103618. -
No comments:
Post a Comment