Presents, a Life with a Plan. My name is Karen Anastasia Placek, I am the author of this Google Blog. This is the story of my journey, a quest to understanding more than myself. The title of my first blog delivered more than a million views!! The title is its work as "The Secret of the Universe is Choice!; know decision" will be the next global slogan. Placed on T-shirts, Jackets, Sweatshirts, it really doesn't matter, 'cause a picture with my slogan is worth more than a thousand words, it's worth??.......Know Conversation!!!
I Need A Bigger Computer Or a Physist To This Sequence Of Building A Barrel. First Proof!! Hello Amy!! You Are In England, Run This Over To Department of Physics, University of Oxford, It Will Be Like The Old Days, You Know Like The Movies With Those Actors Acting The Parts Of The Real People!! Don't Forget My Sweatshirt :)
sequence
10 12 15 17
10 12 15 17.2
2 3 10 12 15 17.2
2 3 10 12 15 17.2
10 12 15 17
10 12 15 17.2
2 3 10 12 15 17.2
2 3 10 12 15 17.2
10 12 15 17
10 12 15 17.2
2 3 10 12 15 17.2
2 3 10 12 15 17.2
10 12 15 17
10 12 15 17.2
10 12 17.2
10 12 17
2 3 10 12
17.2 10 12
12 10 17.2
2 3 17.3
3 2 17.12
12 2 17.1
3 2 12.5
3 2 12.5 2
13 5 = done.
Smarandache Function
The Smarandache function is the function
first considered by Lucas (1883), Neuberg (1887), and Kempner (1918) and subsequently
rediscovered by Smarandache (1980) that gives the smallest value for a given at which (i.e.,
divides factorial).
For example, the number 8 does not divide , , , but does divide
, so
.
For , 2, ..., is given by
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 3, 7, 4, 6, 5, 11, ... (OEIS A002034),
where it should be noted that Sloane defines , while Ashbacher
(1995) and Russo (2000, p. 4) take . The incrementally
largest values of are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17,
19, 23, 29, ... (OEIS A046022), which occur
at the values where . The incrementally
smallest values of relative to
are = 1, 1/2,
1/3, 1/4, 1/6, 1/8, 1/12, 3/40, 1/15, 1/16, 1/24, 1/30, ... (OEIS A094404
and A094372), which occur at , 6, 12, 20,
24, 40, 60, 80, 90, 112, 120, 180, ... (OEIS A094371).
Formulas exist for immediately computing for special
forms of . The simplest cases are
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
where is a prime, are distinct
primes, , and (Kempner
1918). In addition,
(6)
if is the th even perfect
number and is the corresponding Mersenne
prime (Ashbacher 1997; Ruiz 1999a). Finally, if is a prime number
and an integer, then
(7)
(Ruiz 1999b).
The case for is more
complicated, but can be computed by an algorithm due to Kempner (1918). To begin,
define recursively by
(8)
with . This can be solved in closed form
as
(9)
Now find the value of such that , which is given by
i.e., until the remainder . At each
step, is the integer
part of and is the remainder.
For example, in the first step,
and . Then
(16)
(Kempner 1918).
The value of for general is then given by
(17)
(Kempner 1918).
For all
(18)
where is the greatest
prime factor of .
can be computed by finding and testing if divides . If it does,
then . If it doesn't, then and Kempner's algorithm must be used.
The set of for which
(i.e., does not divide ) has density
zero as proposed by Erdős (1991) and proved by Kastanas (1994), but for small
, there are quite a large number of values
for which . The first few of these
are 4, 8, 9, 12, 16, 18, 24, 25, 27, 32, 36, 45, 48, 49, 50, ... (OEIS A057109).
Letting denote the number of positive integers
such that ,
Akbik (1999) subsequently showed that
(19)
This was subsequently improved by Ford (1999) and De Koninck and Doyon
(2003), the former of which is unfortunately incorrect. Ford (1999)
proposed the asymptotic formula
and the constant needs correction (Ivić 2003). Ivić (2003) subsequently showed that
(22)
and, in terms of elementary functions,
(23)
Tutescu (1996) conjectured that never takes
the same value for two consecutive arguments, i.e., for
any . This holds up to at least (Weisstein,
Mar. 3, 2004).
Multiple values of can have the same
value of , as summarized in the following
table for small .
Let denote the smallest inverse of , i.e., the smallest for which . Then is given by
(24)
where
(25)
(J. Sondow, pers. comm., Jan. 17, 2005), where is the greatest prime factor of and is the floor function. For , 2, ..., is given by 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 7, 32, 27, 25,
11, 243, ... (OEIS A046021). Some values of
first occur only for very large
. The sequence of incrementally largest
values of is 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 32, 243, 4096,
59049, 177147, 134217728, ... (OEIS A092233),
corresponding to , 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 27,
32, ... (OEIS A092232).
To find the number of for which , note that by definition, is a divisor of
but not of . Therefore,
to find all for which has a given
value, say all with , take the
set of all divisors of and omit the
divisors of . In particular, the number of for which for is exactly
(26)
where denotes the number of divisors of
, i.e., the divisor
function. Therefore, the numbers of
integers with , 2, ...
are given by 1, 1, 2, 4, 8, 14, 30, 36, 64, 110, ... (OEIS A038024).
In particular, equation (26) shows that the inverse Smarandache function always exists since for every there is an with (hence a
smallest one a(n)), since
for .
Sondow (2006) showed that unexpectedly
arises in an irrationality bound for e, and conjectures
that the inequality holds
for almost all, where "for
almost all" means except for a set of density zero. The exceptions are 2, 3,
6, 8, 12, 15, 20, 24, 30, 36, 40, 45, 48, 60, 72, 80, ... (OEIS A122378).
Since for almost all (Erdős 1991,
Kastanas 1994), where is the greatest prime factor, an equivalent conjecture
is that the inequality holds
for almost all . The exceptions are 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9,
12, 15, 16, 18, 20, 24, 25, 27, 30, 32, 36, ... (OEIS A122380).
D. Wilson points out that if
(27)
is the power of the prime in , where is the
sum of the base- digits of , then it follows
that
(28)
where the minimum is taken over the primes dividing . This minimum appears
to always be achieved when is the greatest
prime factor of .
Ashbacher, C. "Problem 4616." School Sci. Math.97, 221,
1997.
Begay, A. "Smarandache Ceil Functions." Bulletin Pure Appl. Sci. India16E,
227-229, 1997.
De Koninck, J.-M. and Doyon, N. "On a Thin Set of Integers Involving the Largest Prime Factor Function." Int. J. Math. Math. Sci., No. 19, 1185-1192,
2003.
Hungerbühler, N. and Specker, E. "A Generalization of the Smarandache Function to Several Variables." Integers: Electronic J. Combin. Number Th.6,
#A23, 2006 http://www.integers-ejcnt.org/vol6.html.
Mathematica »
The #1 tool for creating Demonstrations and anything technical.
Wolfram|Alpha »
Explore anything with the first computational knowledge engine.
Wolfram Demonstrations Project »
Explore thousands of free applications across science,
mathematics, engineering, technology, business, art, finance, social
sciences, and more.
Step-by-step Solutions »
Walk through homework problems step-by-step from beginning to end. Hints help you try the next step on your own.
Wolfram Problem Generator »
Unlimited random practice problems and answers with built-in
Step-by-step solutions. Practice online or make a printable study sheet.
Wolfram Education Portal »
Collection of teaching and learning tools built by Wolfram
education experts: dynamic textbook, lesson plans, widgets, interactive
Demonstrations, and more.
Presents, a Life with a Plan. My name is Karen Anastasia Placek, I am the author of this Google Blog. This is the story of my journey, a quest to understanding more than myself. The title of my first blog delivered more than a million views!! The title is its work as "The Secret of the Universe is Choice!; know decision" will be the next global slogan. Placed on T-shirts, Jackets, Sweatshirts, it really doesn't matter, 'cause a picture with my slogan is worth more than a thousand words, it's worth??.......Know Conversation!!!
No comments:
Post a Comment