Hi, where are you from?

My photo
Presents, a Life with a Plan. My name is Karen Anastasia Placek, I am the author of this Google Blog. This is the story of my journey, a quest to understanding more than myself. The title of my first blog delivered more than a million views!! The title is its work as "The Secret of the Universe is Choice!; know decision" will be the next global slogan. Placed on T-shirts, Jackets, Sweatshirts, it really doesn't matter, 'cause a picture with my slogan is worth more than a thousand words, it's worth??.......Know Conversation!!!

Friday, November 16, 2018

I Am Just Working It Out, It's Called Mathematics And I Will Not Leave The Most Read Book In The World Out As It Is The Principle Belief In My Country The United States Of America. Now I Don't Have To Believe In The Rhetoric However I Respect The Belief In And Of Itself And As Tradition In So Many Of The Sciences Mandates? No, This Is “No Man Left Behind”.

The Principles of Mathematics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The Principles of Mathematics
The Principles of Mathematics.jpg
Title page of first edition
AuthorBertrand Russell
TranslatorLouis Couturat
CountryUnited Kingdom
LanguageEnglish
SeriesI. (all published.)
SubjectMathematics, Logic
GenreFoundations of mathematics, Symbolic logic
PublisherCambridge University Press
Publication date
1903, 1938, 1951, 1996, and 2009
Pages534 (first edition)
ISBN978-1-313-30597-6 Paperback edition
OCLC1192386
Websitehttp://fair-use.org/bertrand-russell/the-principles-of-mathematics/
The Principles of Mathematics (PoM) is a book written by Bertrand Russell in 1903. In it he presented his famous paradox and argued his thesis that mathematics and logic are identical.[1]
The book presents a view of the foundations of mathematics and has become a classic reference. It reported on developments by Giuseppe Peano, Mario Pieri, Richard Dedekind, Georg Cantor, and others.
In 1905 Louis Couturat published a partial French translation[2] that expanded the book's readership. In 1937 Russell prepared a new introduction saying, "Such interest as the book now possesses is historical, and consists in the fact that it represents a certain stage in the development of its subject." Further editions were printed in 1938, 1951, 1996, and 2009.

Contents

The Principles of Mathematics consists of 59 chapters divided into seven parts: indefinables in mathematics, number, quantity, order, infinity and continuity, space, matter and motion.
In chapter one, "Definition of Pure Mathematics", Russell asserts that :
The fact that all Mathematics is Symbolic Logic is one of the greatest discoveries of our age; and when this fact has been established, the remainder of the principles of mathematics consists in the analysis of Symbolic Logic itself.[3]
There is an anticipation of relativity physics in the final part as the last three chapters consider Newton's laws of motion, absolute and relative motion, and Hertz's dynamics. However, Russell rejects what he calls "the relational theory", and says on page 489 :
For us, since absolute space and time have been admitted, there is no need to avoid absolute motion, and indeed no possibility of doing so.
In his review, G. H. Hardy says "Mr. Russell is a firm believer in absolute position in space and time, a view as much out of fashion nowadays that Chapter [58: Absolute and Relative Motion] will be read with peculiar interest."[4]

Early reviews

Reviews were prepared by G. E. Moore and Charles Sanders Peirce, but Moore's was never published[5] and that of Peirce was brief and somewhat dismissive. He indicated that he thought it unoriginal, saying that the book "can hardly be called literature" and "Whoever wishes a convenient introduction to the remarkable researches into the logic of mathematics that have been made during the last sixty years [...] will do well to take up this book."[6]
G. H. Hardy wrote a favorable review[4] expecting the book to appeal more to philosophers than mathematicians. But he says :
[I]n spite of its five hundred pages the book is much too short. Many chapters dealing with important questions are compressed into five or six pages, and in some places, especially in the most avowedly controversial parts, the argument is almost too condensed to follow. And the philosopher who attempts to read the book will be especially puzzled by the constant presupposition of a whole philosophical system utterly unlike any of those usually accepted.
In 1904 another review appeared in Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society (11(2):74–93) written by Edwin Bidwell Wilson. He says "The delicacy of the question is such that even the greatest mathematicians and philosophers of to-day have made what seem to be substantial slips of judgement and have shown on occasions an astounding ignorance of the essence of the problem which they were discussing. ... all too frequently it has been the result of a wholly unpardonable disregard of the work already accomplished by others." Wilson recounts the developments of Peano that Russell reports, and takes the occasion to correct Henri Poincaré who had ascribed them to David Hilbert. In praise of Russell, Wilson says "Surely the present work is a monument to patience, perseverance, and thoroughness." (page 88)

Second edition

In 1938 the book was re-issued with a new preface by Russell. This preface was interpreted as a retreat from the realism of the first edition and a turn toward nominalist philosophy of symbolic logic. James Feibleman, an admirer of the book, thought Russell’s new preface went too far into nominalism so he wrote a rebuttal to this introduction.[7] Feibleman says, "It is the first comprehensive treatise on symbolic logic to be written in English; and it gives to that system of logic a realistic interpretation."

Later reviews

In 1959 Russell wrote My Philosophical Development, in which he recalled the impetus to write the Principles:
It was at the International Congress of Philosophy in Paris in the year 1900 that I became aware of the importance of logical reform for the philosophy of mathematics. ... I was impressed by the fact that, in every discussion, [Peano] showed more precision and more logical rigour than was shown by anybody else. ... It was [Peano's works] that gave the impetus to my own views on the principles of mathematics.[8]
Recalling the book after his later work, he provides this evaluation:
The Principles of Mathematics, which I finished on 23 May 1902, turned out to be a crude and rather immature draft of the subsequent work [Principia Mathematica], from which, however, it differed in containing controversy with other philosophies of mathematics.[9]
Such self-deprecation from the author after half a century of philosophical growth is understandable. On the other hand, Jules Vuillemin wrote in 1968:
The Principles inaugurated contemporary philosophy. Other works have won and lost the title. Such is not the case with this one. It is serious, and its wealth perseveres. Furthermore, in relation to it, in a deliberate fashion or not, it locates itself again today in the eyes of all those that believe that contemporary science has modified our representation of the universe and through this representation, our relation to ourselves and to others.[10]
When W. V. O. Quine penned his autobiography, he wrote:[11]
Peano's symbolic notation took Russell by storm in 1900, but Russell’s Principles was still in unrelieved prose. I was inspired by its profundity [in 1928] and baffled by its frequent opacity. In part it was rough going because of the cumbersomeness of ordinary language as compared with the suppleness of a notation especially devised for these intricate themes. Rereading it years later, I discovered that it had been rough going also because matters were unclear in Russell's own mind in those pioneer days.
The Principles was an early expression of analytic philosophy and thus has come under close examination.[12] Peter Hylton wrote, "The book has an air of excitement and novelty to it ... The salient characteristic of Principles is ... the way in which the technical work is integrated into metaphysical argument."[12]:168
Ivor Grattan-Guinness made an in-depth study of Principles. First he published Dear Russell – Dear Jourdain (1977)[13] which included correspondence with Philip Jourdain who promulgated some of the book’s ideas. Then in 2000 Grattan-Guinness published The Search for Mathematical Roots 1870 – 1940 which considered the author’s circumstances, the book’s composition and its shortcomings.[14]
In 2006, Philip Ehrlich challenged the validity of Russell's analysis of infinitesimals in the Leibniz tradition.[15] A recent study documents the non-sequiturs in Russell's critique of the infinitesimals of Gottfried Leibniz and Hermann Cohen.[16]

See also

Notes


  • Russell, Bertrand (1938) [First published 1903]. Principles of Mathematics (2nd ed.). W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 0-393-00249-7. The fundamental thesis of the following pages, that mathematics and logic are identical, is one which I have never since seen any reason to modify. The quotation is from the first page of Russell's introduction to the second (1938) edition.
    1. Katz, Mikhail; Sherry, David (2012), "Leibniz's Infinitesimals: Their Fictionality, Their Modern Implementations, and Their Foes from Berkeley to Russell and Beyond", Erkenntnis, arXiv:1205.0174, doi:10.1007/s10670-012-9370-y.

    References

    • Stefan Andersson (1994). In Quest of Certainty: Bertrand Russell's Search for Certainty in Religion and Mathematics Up to The Principles of Mathematics. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell. ISBN 91-22-01607-4.

    External links

    Navigation menu

  • Louis Couturat (1905) Les Principes des mathématiques: avec un appendice sur la philosophie des mathématiques de Kant. Republished 1965, Georg Olms
  • Bertrand Russell, Principles of Mathematics (1903), p.5
  • G. H. Hardy (18 September 1903) "The Philosophy of Mathematics", Times Literary Supplement #88
  • Quin, Arthur (1977). The Confidence of British Philosophers. p. 221. ISBN 90-04-05397-2.
  • See the first paragraph of his review of What is Meaning? and The Principles of Mathematics (1903), The Nation, v. 77, n. 1998, p. 308, Google Books Eprint, reprinted in Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce v. 8 (1958), paragraph 171 footnote. The review was publicly anonymous like the other reviews (totaling over 300) that Peirce wrote for The Nation on a regular basis. Murray Murphy called the review "so brief and cursory that I am convinced that he never read the book." in Murphy, Murray (1993). The Development of Peirce's Philosophy. Hackett Pub. Co. p. 241. ISBN 0-87220-231-3. Others such as Norbert Wiener and Christine Ladd-Franklin shared Peirce's view of Russell's work. See Anellis, Irving (1995), "Peirce Rustled, Russell Pierced", Modern Logic 5, 270–328.
  • James Feibleman (1944) Reply to the Introduction of the Second Edition, pages 157 to 174 of The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell, P.A. Schilpp, editor, link from HathiTrust
  • Russell, My Philosophical Development, p. 65.
  • Russell, My Philosophical Development, p. 74.
  • Jules Vuillemin (1968) Leçons sur la primière philosophie de Russell, page 333, Paris: Colin
  • W. V. O. Quine (1985) The Time of My Life, page 59, MIT Press ISBN 0-262-17003-5
  • Peter Hylton (1990) Russell, Idealism, and the Emergence of Analytic Philosophy, chapter 5: Russell’s Principles of Mathematics, pp 167 to 236, Clarendon Press, ISBN 0-19-824626-9
  • Ivor Grattan-Guinness (1977) Dear Russell – Dear Jourdain: a commentary on Russell’s logic, based on his correspondence with Philip Jourdain, Duckworth Overlook ISBN 0-7156-1010-4
  • Ivor Grattan-Guinness (2000) The Search for Mathematical Roots 1870–1940: Logics, Set Theories, and the Foundations of Mathematics from Cantor through Russell to Gödel, Princeton University Press ISBN 0-691-05858-X. See pages 292–302 and 310–326
  • Ehrlich, Philip (2006), "The rise of non-Archimedean mathematics and the roots of a misconception. I. The emergence of non-Archimedean systems of magnitudes", Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 60 (1): 1–121, doi:10.1007/s00407-005-0102-4


  • "The number 3 multiplies itself through the system as a perfect square. It bounces from position 3, to 6, to 9, to 12. All multiples of 3 are found in these positions."  N. Tesla

    1 1 2 3 5 8 13(1+3) 4(3+4) 7(4+7) 11(1+1) 2(1+2) 3(2+3) 5(3+5) 8(5+8) 13(1+3) 4(3+4) 7(4+7) 11(1+1) 2(1+2) 3(2+3) 5(3+5) 8(5+8) 13(1+3) 4(3+4) 7(4+7) 11(1+1) 2(1+2) 3(2+3) 5(3+5) 8(5+8) 13(1+3) 4(3+4) 7(4+7) 11
    https://anindependentmindknotlogic.blogspot.com/2018/11/fibonacci-sequence-changes-and-pattern.html?zx=b51d2cb1ded4fc42
    Figure 1: 7 + 11 + 2 = 20(2+0) 2        = 2.0
                                       20(2x0) 0        = 0.0          
    Figure 2: 7 x 11 x 2 = 154(1+5+4) 10 = 1.0

    Figure 3: π(1+1+1) = 3 = 3.141
           
    "11 is the top left prime position.  It cascades out to the left and circles back around the system." N. Tesla

    Figure 5:  11(1+1) 2



    Genesis 7:9 KJV: There went in two and two unto Noah into the ark
    Genesis 7:12 KJV: And the rain was upon the earth forty days and forty nights.
    1 John 5:7 KJVFor there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.
    Hebrews 6:1 KJV: Therefore leaving the principles of the doctrine of Christ, let us go on unto perfection; not laying again the foundation of repentance from dead works, and of faith toward God

    What is mathematics but timing, it is tone, in tone the timing would be the number itself, a sort of address.  

    If we were to look at Genesis as a record of science instead of missing this piece or look at N. Tesla's words as the missing piece or just say 1,2,3 equals for, would that increase the relativity to our existence by extending time and not multiplying problems? Why is Noah in the Book of Genesis when Adam and Eve are meant to explain everything?  Is that the missing parallel line that we should cross, a line that we'll evolve a little bit more in our understanding and possibly find the figure is the missing piece:

     As this identifies the intersection from which different angles can cross!!  The bibical viewers must admit that three in one is pi as the number π demonstrates I I I in its signature and it is one letter/number.


    The Principles of Mathematics consists of 59 chapters divided into seven parts: indefinables in mathematics, number, quantity, order, infinity and continuity, space, matter and motion.

    In chapter one, "Definition of Pure Mathematics", Russell asserts that :

    "The fact that all Mathematics is Symbolic Logic is one of the greatest discoveries of our age; and when this fact has been established, the remainder of the principles of mathematics consists in the analysis of Symbolic Logic itself."

    The Principles of Mathematics - Wikipedia


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Principles_of_Mathematics


    de·nom·i·na·tor
    /dəˈnäməˌnādər/
    noun
    Mathematics
    noun: denominator; plural noun: denominators
    1. the number below the line in a common fraction; a divisor.
      • a figure representing the total population in terms of which statistical values are expressed.

    Electric arc

    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Jump to navigation Jump to search
    An electric arc between two nails
    An electric arc, or arc discharge, is an electrical breakdown of a gas that produces an ongoing electrical discharge. The current through a normally nonconductive medium such as air produces a plasma; the plasma may produce visible light. An arc discharge is characterized by a lower voltage than a glow discharge and relies on thermionic emission of electrons from the electrodes supporting the arc. An archaic term is voltaic arc, as used in the phrase "voltaic arc lamp".
    Techniques for arc suppression can be used to reduce the duration or likelihood of arc formation.
    In the late 1800s, electric arc lighting was in wide use for public lighting. Some low-pressure electric arcs are used in many applications. For example, fluorescent tubes, mercury, sodium, and metal-halide lamps are used for lighting; xenon arc lamps have been used for movie projectors.

    History

    Natural Lightning is now considered an electric spark, not electric arc.
    The phenomenon is believed to be first described by Sir Humphry Davy in an 1801 paper published in William Nicholson's Journal of Natural Philosophy, Chemistry and the Arts.[1] However, Davy's description was not an electric arc, but spark, as this phenomenon is considered by the modern science: "This is evidently the description, not of an arc, but of a spark. For the essence of an arc is that it should be continuous, and that the poles should not be in contact after it has once started. The spark produced by Sir Humphry Davy was plainly not continuous; and although the carbons remained red hot for some time after contact, there can have been no arc joining them, or so close an observer would have mentioned it".[2] In the same year Davy publicly demonstrated the effect, before the Royal Society, by transmitting an electric current through two touching carbon rods and then pulling them a short distance apart. The demonstration produced a "feeble" arc, not readily distinguished from a sustained spark, between charcoal points. The Society subscribed for a more powerful battery of 1,000 plates, and in 1808 he demonstrated the large-scale arc.[3] He is credited with naming the arc.[4] He called it an arc because it assumes the shape of an upward bow when the distance between the electrodes is not small.[5] This is due to the buoyant force on the hot gas.
    The first continuous arc was discovered independently in 1802 and described in 1803[6] as a "special fluid with electrical properties", by Vasily V. Petrov, a Russian scientist experimenting with a copper-zinc battery consisting of 4200 discs.[6][7]
    In the late nineteenth century, electric arc lighting was in wide use for public lighting. The tendency of electric arcs to flicker and hiss was a major problem. In 1895, Hertha Marks Ayrton wrote a series of articles for the Electrician, explaining that these phenomena were the result of oxygen coming into contact with the carbon rods used to create the arc. In 1899, she was the first woman ever to read her own paper before the Institution of Electrical Engineers (IEE). Her paper was entitled "The Hissing of the Electric Arc". Shortly thereafter, Ayrton was elected the first female member of the IEE; the next woman to be admitted to the IEE was in 1958.[8] She petitioned to present a paper before the Royal Society, but she was not allowed because of her sex, and "The Mechanism of the Electric Arc" was read by John Perry in her stead in 1901.

    Overview

    Electric arcs between the power line and pantographs of an electric train after catenary icing
    Electricity arcs between the power rail and electrical pickup "shoe" on a London Underground train
    An electric arc is the form of electric discharge with the highest current density. The maximum current through an arc is limited only by the external circuit, not by the arc itself.
    An arc between two electrodes can be initiated by ionization and glow discharge, when the current through the electrodes is increased. The breakdown voltage of the electrode gap is a combined function of the pressure, distance between electrodes and type of gas surrounding the electrodes. When an arc starts, its terminal voltage is much less than a glow discharge, and current is higher. An arc in gases near atmospheric pressure is characterized by visible light emission, high current density, and high temperature. An arc is distinguished from a glow discharge partly by the approximately equal effective temperatures of both electrons and positive ions; but in a glow discharge, ions have much less thermal energy than the electrons.
    A drawn arc can be initiated by two electrodes initially in contact and drawn apart; this can initiate an arc without the high-voltage glow discharge. This is the way a welder starts to weld a joint, momentarily touching the welding electrode against the workpiece then withdrawing it till a stable arc is formed. Another example is separation of electrical contacts in switches, relays or circuit breakers; in high-energy circuits arc suppression may be required to prevent damage to contacts.[9]
    Electrical resistance along the continuous electric arc creates heat, which ionizes more gas molecules (where the degree of ionization is determined by temperature), and as per this sequence: solid-liquid-gas-plasma; the gas is gradually turned into a thermal plasma. A thermal plasma is in thermal equilibrium; the temperature is relatively homogeneous throughout the atoms, molecules, ions, and electrons. The energy given to electrons is dispersed rapidly to the heavier particles by elastic collisions, due to their great mobility and large numbers.
    Current in the arc is sustained by thermionic emission and field emission of electrons at the cathode. The current may be concentrated in a very small hot spot on the cathode; current densities on the order of one million amperes per square centimeter can be found. Unlike a glow discharge, an arc has little discernible structure, since the positive column is quite bright and extends nearly to the electrodes on both ends. The cathode fall and anode fall of a few volts occur within a fraction of a millimeter of each electrode. The positive column has a lower voltage gradient and may be absent in very short arcs.[9]
    A low-frequency (less than 100 Hz) alternating current arc resembles a direct current arc; on each cycle, the arc is initiated by breakdown, and the electrodes interchange roles, as anode or cathode, when current reverses. As the frequency of the current increases, there is not enough time for all ionization to disperse on each half cycle, and the breakdown is no longer needed to sustain the arc; the voltage vs. current characteristic becomes more nearly ohmic.[9]
    Electric arc between strands of wire.
    The various shapes of electric arcs are emergent properties of non-linear patterns of current and electric field. The arc occurs in the gas-filled space between two conductive electrodes (often made of tungsten or carbon) and it results in a very high temperature, capable of melting or vaporizing most materials. An electric arc is a continuous discharge, while the similar electric spark discharge is momentary. An electric arc may occur either in direct current (DC) circuits or in alternating current (AC) circuits. In the latter case, the arc may re-strike on each half cycle of the current. An electric arc differs from a glow discharge in that the current density is quite high, and the voltage drop within the arc is low; at the cathode, the current density can be as high as one megaampere per square centimeter.[9]
    An electric arc has a non-linear relationship between current and voltage. Once the arc is established (either by progression from a glow discharge[10] or by momentarily touching the electrodes then separating them), increased current results in a lower voltage between the arc terminals. This negative resistance effect requires that some positive form of impedance (as an electrical ballast) be placed in the circuit to maintain a stable arc. This property is the reason uncontrolled electrical arcs in apparatus become so destructive since once initiated, an arc will draw more and more current from a fixed-voltage supply until the apparatus is destroyed.

    Uses

    An electric arc can melt calcium oxide
    Industrially, electric arcs are used for welding, plasma cutting, for electrical discharge machining, as an arc lamp in movie projectors and followspots in stage lighting. Electric arc furnaces are used to produce steel and other substances. Calcium carbide is made in this way as it requires a large amount of energy to promote an endothermic reaction (at temperatures of 2500 °C).
    Carbon arc lights were the first electric lights. They were used for street lights in the 19th century and for specialized applications such as searchlights until World War 2. Today, low-pressure electric arcs are used in many applications. For example, fluorescent tubes, mercury, sodium, and metal halide lamps are used for lighting; xenon arc lamps are used for movie projectors.
    Formation of an intense electric arc, similar to a small-scale arc flash, is the foundation of exploding-bridgewire detonators.
    A major remaining application is in high voltage switchgear for high-voltage transmission networks. Modern devices use sulphur hexafluoride at high pressure in a nozzle flow between separated electrodes within a pressure vessel. The AC fault current is interrupted at current zero by the highly electronegative SF6 ions absorbing free electrons from the decaying plasma. A similar air-based technology has largely been replaced because many noisy units in series were required to prevent the current re-igniting under similar supergrid conditions.
    Electric arcs have been studied for electric propulsion of spacecraft.

    Guiding the arc

    Scientists have discovered a method to control the path of an arc between two electrodes by firing laser beams at the gas between the electrodes. The gas becomes a plasma and guides the arc. By constructing the plasma path between the electrodes with different laser beams, the arc can be formed into curved and S-shaped paths. The arc could also hit an obstacle and reform on the other side of the obstacle. The laser-guided arc technology could be useful in applications to deliver a spark of electricity to a precise spot.[11][12]

    Undesired arcing

    Undesired or unintended electric arcing can have detrimental effects on electric power transmission, distribution systems and electronic equipment. Devices which may cause arcing include switches, circuit breakers, relay contacts, fuses and poor cable terminations. When an inductive circuit is switched off, the current cannot instantaneously jump to zero: a transient arc will be formed across the separating contacts. Switching devices susceptible to arcing are normally designed to contain and extinguish an arc, and snubber circuits can supply a path for transient currents, preventing arcing. If a circuit has enough current and voltage to sustain an arc formed outside of a switching device, the arc can cause damage to equipment such as melting of conductors, destruction of insulation, and fire. An arc flash describes an explosive electrical event that presents a hazard to people and equipment.
    Undesired arcing in electrical contacts of contactors, relays and switches can be reduced by devices such as contact arc suppressors[13] and RC Snubbers or through techniques including:
    Arcing can also occur when a low resistance channel (foreign object, conductive dust, moisture...) forms between places with different voltage. The conductive channel then can facilitate formation of an electric arc. The ionized air has high electrical conductivity approaching that of metals, and it can conduct extremely high currents, causing a short circuit and tripping protective devices (fuses and circuit breakers). A similar situation may occur when a lightbulb burns out and the fragments of the filament pull an electric arc between the leads inside the bulb, leading to overcurrent that trips the breakers.
    An electric arc over the surface of plastics causes their degradation. A conductive carbon-rich track tends to form in the arc path, called "carbon tracking", negatively influencing their insulation properties. The arc susceptibility, or "track resistance", is tested according to ASTM D495, by point electrodes and continuous and intermittent arcs; it is measured in seconds required to form a track that is conductive under high-voltage low-current conditions.[14] Some materials are less susceptible to degradation than others. For example, polytetrafluoroethylene has arc resistance of about 200 seconds (3.3 minutes). From thermosetting plastics, alkyds and melamine resins are better than phenolic resins. Polyethylenes have arc resistance of about 150 seconds; polystyrenes and polyvinyl chlorides have relatively low resistance of about 70 seconds. Plastics can be formulated to emit gases with arc-extinguishing properties; these are known as arc-extinguishing plastics.[15]
    Arcing over some types of printed circuit boards, possibly due to cracks of the traces or the failure of a solder, renders the affected insulating layer conductive as the dielectric is combusted due to the high temperatures involved. This conductivity prolongs the arcing due to cascading failure of the surface.

    Arc suppression

    Arc suppression is a method of attempting to reduce or eliminate an electrical arc. There are several possible areas of use of arc suppression methods, among them metal film deposition and sputtering, arc flash protection, electrostatic processes where electrical arcs are not desired (such as powder painting, air purification, PVDF film poling) and contact current arc suppression. In industrial, military and consumer electronic design, the latter method generally applies to devices such as electromechanical power switches, relays and contactors. In this context, arc suppression uses contact protection.
    Part of the energy of an electrical arc forms new chemical compounds from the air surrounding the arc: these include oxides of nitrogen and ozone, the second of which can be detected by its distinctive sharp smell. These chemicals can be produced by high-power contacts in relays and motor commutators, and they are corrosive to nearby metal surfaces. Arcing also erodes the surfaces of the contacts, wearing them down and creating high contact resistance when closed.[16]

    See also

    References











  • Ayrton, Hertha (2015). Electric Arc (CLASSIC REPRINT). S.l: FORGOTTEN BOOKS. p. 94. ISBN 978-1330187593.

    1. "Lab Note #106 Environmental Impact of Arc Suppression". Arc Suppression Technologies. April 2011. Retrieved October 10, 2011.

    External links

    Navigation menu

    Languages











  • The Electric Arc, by Hertha Ayrton, page 20

  • Luckiesh, Matthew (1920). "Artificial light, its influence upon civilization". Nature. 107 (2694): 112. Bibcode:1921Natur.107..486.. doi:10.1038/107486b0. hdl:2027/chi.14153449. OCLC 1446711.

  • "Arc". The Columbia Encyclopedia (3rd ed.). New York: Columbia University Press. 1963. LCCN 63020205.

  • Davy, Humphry (1812). Elements of Chemical Philosophy. p. 85. ISBN 978-0-217-88947-6. This is the likely origin of the term "arc".

  • "Tracking down the origin of arc plasma Science-II. Early continuous discharges". by André ANDERS. IEEE Xplore, ieee.org. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science. Volume: 31, issue: 5, Oct 2003.

  • Kartsev, V.P. (1983). Shea, William R., ed. Nature Mathematized. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic. p. 279. ISBN 978-90-277-1402-2.

  • Mason, Joan. "Sarah Ayrton". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/37136. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)

  • Howatson, A.M. (1965). "An Introduction to Gas Discharges". Plasma Sources Science and Technology. 9 (4): 47–101. Bibcode:2000PSST....9..517B. doi:10.1088/0963-0252/9/4/307. ISBN 978-0-08-020575-5.

  • Mehta, V.K. (2005). Principles of Electronics: for Diploma, AMIE, Degree & Other Engineering Examinations (9th, multicolour illustrative ed.). New Delhi: S. Chand. pp. 101–107. ISBN 978-81-219-2450-4.

  • "Laser beams make lightning tunnels". Retrieved 2015-06-20.

  • Clerici, Matteo; Hu, Yi; Lassonde, Philippe; Milián, Carles; Couairon, Arnaud; Christodoulides, Demetrios N.; Chen, Zhigang; Razzari, Luca; Vidal, François (2015-06-01). "Laser-assisted guiding of electric discharges around objects". Science Advances. 1 (5): e1400111. Bibcode:2015SciA....1E0111C. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1400111. ISSN 2375-2548. PMC 4640611. PMID 26601188.

  • "Arc Suppression". Retrieved December 6, 2013.

  • Harper, Charles A.; Petrie, Edward M. (2003). Plastics Materials and Processes: A Concise Encyclopedia. John Wiley & Sons. p. 565. ISBN 9780471456032.

  • Harper & Petrie 2003, p. ???[page needed]
  • No comments:

    Post a Comment

    An Independent Mind, Knot Logic

    An Independent Mind, Knot Logic

    This Words Sing Hosanna Equated word[Worth] Isaiah and word Smoked Equated word Worth Smoke the Magic Dragon and I had word Puff!!

      Simple Complexity by Karen A. Placek In complexity there is simplicity, once you see simplicity you once again understand how complex sim...

    Karen A. Placek, aka Karen Placek, K.A.P., KAP

    My photo
    Presents, a Life with a Plan. My name is Karen Anastasia Placek, I am the author of this Google Blog. This is the story of my journey, a quest to understanding more than myself. The title of my first blog delivered more than a million views!! The title is its work as "The Secret of the Universe is Choice!; know decision" will be the next global slogan. Placed on T-shirts, Jackets, Sweatshirts, it really doesn't matter, 'cause a picture with my slogan is worth more than a thousand words, it's worth??.......Know Conversation!!!

    Know Decision of the Public: Popular Posts!!