Cantore Arithmetic is able to identify the consort of the Kennedy Administration. This available information is new as the library of the President is at known and the address to turmoil as the president of the United States of America was assassinated is a a location in Boston, Massachusetts. The John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum is the presidential library and museum of John Fitzgerald Kennedy (1917–1963), the 35th president of the United States (1961–1963).
Cantore Arithmetic is able to hold the entire presidency in the word can as the worth is held to the addition in possible as the administration was cut short. The base is the supplemental, the query to rocket read Earth as the Moon is the administration leaving the autumn to the season as the spice is delivered!
To quart the quat greats the number to the presidency as the thirty hyphen fifth outlasts more than the mason as the mortar is of human and the growth is of man. The degree to the succeeded is determined by the Secret Service of his administration and the time a go is left to the academy of tho at the actual of whom determines the foot to the prints as the band is at the office of whom decides the base: Camp David is the retreat and so on.
To lumber the identifying of the sacrifice goes to whom is and has been identified in the media: The Cops have held that title as the media is constant of word to camera and stating the ultimate sacrifice at word loss.
So Cops are not Angels, nor Devils, nor Satan and thereby are unable to hold initiative to worth of value at words of character and may only be identified as beings ultimate and therefrom are Ultimates. And comma as the ultimates have been named the gear goes to understanding: Saddled equated groins(The perineum) and Equaled equated heave as the averages in text goes to the liver and now comma goes to the sex. What to expect while expecting goes to the saddle as that is the text for the medical field and identified by the show: Revelation 21:17 “And he measured the wall thereof, an hundred and forty and four cubits, according to the measure of a man, that is, of the angel.” King James Version (KJV): Death equated prime! Retreats equated tread as liver equates silver and the Catholics are dead.
Now, Bill O’Reilly can be able to do the Cantore Mathematics. Joe Biden as the 46th President of the United States said that he could not feel the power, he said this in office at the beginning of his service. Now, Joe Biden is an incumbent and is a catholic priest as his power is not the christian minister and at such their power is not in the congregation as their god is within them and that is a house. So comma Joe Biden as the 46th President is a hood!! The word italics will suffice for backslash in punctuation for the library of the 46th President of the United States as the Hood will be logos’: Forspaken!
addendum1: for spake in at revelations to dictionary Merriam-Webster revealing identifies Veal at the kjv comma sown as in now Mr. President 46 at the U.S.ofA is not evil and those applicable to guilty equated Plasma sin period dot com: Tony Robbins is accessible now as is written in our Constitution: Freedom of religion equated motivational or one line is basic to word practice without a cult; kjv!!
Addendum21: There is an increase to our Constitution: The Constitution now has included spiritual law.
Matthew 27:51
“And, behold, the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom; and the earth did quake, and the rocks rent;”
King James Version (KJV)
Liberty
 | This article possibly contains original research. (October 2022) |
Liberty is the state of being free within society from oppressive restrictions imposed by authority on one's way of life, behavior, or political views.[1]
In theology, liberty is freedom from the effects of "sin, spiritual servitude, [or] worldly ties".[2]
In economics, liberty means free, fair, and open competition, often referred to as a free market.
In the Constitutional law of the United States, Ordered liberty means creating a balanced society where individuals have the freedom to act without unnecessary interference (negative liberty) and access to opportunities and resources to pursue their goals (positive liberty), all within a fair legal system.
Sometimes liberty is differentiated from freedom by using the word "freedom" primarily, if not exclusively, to mean the ability to do as one wills and what one has the power to do; and using the word "liberty" to mean the absence of arbitrary restraints, taking into account the rights of all involved. In this sense, the exercise of liberty is subject to capability and limited by the rights of others. Thus liberty entails the responsible use of freedom under the rule of law without depriving anyone else of their freedom. Liberty can be taken away as a form of punishment. In many countries, people can be deprived of their liberty if they are convicted of criminal acts.
Liberty originates from the Latin word libertas, derived from the name of the goddess Libertas, who, along with more modern personifications, is often used to portray the concept, and the archaic Roman god Liber.[citation needed]The word "liberty" is often used in slogans, such as in "Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness"[3] and "Liberté, égalité, fraternité".[4]
Philosophy[edit]
Philosophers from the earliest times have considered the question of liberty. Roman Emperor Marcus Aurelius (121–180 AD) wrote:
According to compatibilist Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679):
John Locke (1632–1704) rejected that definition of liberty. While not specifically mentioning Hobbes, he attacks Sir Robert Filmer who had the same definition. According to Locke:
John Stuart Mill, in his 1859 work, On Liberty, was the first to recognize the difference between liberty as the freedom to act and liberty as the absence of coercion.[7]
In his 1958 lecture "Two Concepts of Liberty", Isaiah Berlin formally framed the differences between two perspectives as the distinction between two opposite concepts of liberty: positive liberty and negative liberty. The latter designates a negative condition in which an individual is protected from tyrannyand the arbitrary exercise of authority, while the former refers to the liberty that comes from self-mastery, the freedom from inner compulsions such as weakness and fear.[8]
Politics[edit]
History[edit]
The modern concept of political liberty has its origins in the Greek concepts of freedom and slavery.[9] To be free, to the Greeks, was not to have a master, to be independent from a master (to live as one likes).[10][11] That was the original Greek concept of freedom. It is closely linked with the concept of democracy, as Aristotle put it:
- "This, then, is one note of liberty which all democrats affirm to be the principle of their state. Another is that a man should live as he likes. This, they say, is the privilege of a freeman, since, on the other hand, not to live as a man likes is the mark of a slave. This is the second characteristic of democracy, whence has arisen the claim of men to be ruled by none, if possible, or, if this is impossible, to rule and be ruled in turns; and so it contributes to the freedom based upon equality."[12]
This applied only to free men. In Athens, for instance, women could not vote or hold office and were legally and socially dependent on a male relative.[13]
The populations of the Persian Empire enjoyed some degree of freedom. Citizens of all religions and ethnic groups were given the same rights and had the same freedom of religion, women had the same rights as men, and slavery was abolished (550 BC). All the palaces of the kings of Persia were built by paid workers in an era when slaves typically did such work.[14]
In the Maurya Empire of ancient India, citizens of all religions and ethnic groups had some rights to freedom, tolerance, and equality. The need for tolerance on an egalitarian basis can be found in the Edicts of Ashoka the Great, which emphasize the importance of tolerance in public policy by the government. The slaughter or capture of prisoners of war also appears to have been condemned by Ashoka.[15] Slavery also appears to have been non-existent in the Maurya Empire.[16] However, according to Hermann Kulke and Dietmar Rothermund, "Ashoka's orders seem to have been resisted right from the beginning."[17]
Roman law also embraced certain limited forms of liberty, even under the rule of the Roman Emperors. However, these liberties were accorded only to Roman citizens. Many of the liberties enjoyed under Roman law endured through the Middle Ages, but were enjoyed solely by the nobility, rarely by the common man.[citation needed] The idea of inalienable and universal liberties had to wait until the Age of Enlightenment.
Social contract[edit]
The social contract theory, most influentially formulated by Hobbes, John Locke and Rousseau (though first suggested by Plato in The Republic), was among the first to provide a political classification of rights, in particular through the notion of sovereignty and of natural rights. The thinkers of the Enlightenment reasoned that lawgoverned both heavenly and human affairs, and that law gave the king his power, rather than the king's power giving force to law. This conception of law would find its culmination in the ideas of Montesquieu. The conception of law as a relationship between individuals, rather than families, came to the fore, and with it the increasing focus on individual liberty as a fundamental reality, given by "Nature and Nature's God," which, in the ideal state, would be as universal as possible.
In On Liberty, John Stuart Mill sought to define the "...nature and limits of the power which can be legitimately exercised by society over the individual," and as such, he describes an inherent and continuous antagonism between liberty and authority and thus, the prevailing question becomes "how to make the fitting adjustment between individual independence and social control".[18]
Origins of political freedom[edit]
England and Great Britain[edit]
 |
.jpg)
Timeline:
- 1066 – as a condition of his coronation William the Conqueror assented to the London Charter of Liberties which guaranteed the "Saxon" liberties of the City of London.
- 1100 – the Charter of Liberties is passed which sets out certain liberties of nobles, church officials and individuals.
- 1166 – Henry II of England transformed English law by passing the Assize of Clarendon. The act, a forerunner to trial by jury, started the abolition of trial by combat and trial by ordeal.[19]
- 1187-1189 – publication of Tractatus de legibus et consuetudinibus regni Anglie which contains authoritative definitions of freedom and servitude.
- 1215 – Magna Carta was enacted, becoming the cornerstone of liberty in first England, then Great Britain, and later the world.[20][21]
- 1628 – the English Parliament passed the Petition of Right which set out specific liberties of English citizens.
- 1679 – the English Parliament passed the Habeas Corpus Act which outlawed unlawful or arbitrary imprisonment.
- 1689 – the Bill of Rights granted "freedom of speech in Parliament", and reinforced many existing civil rights in England. The Scots law equivalent the Claim of Right is also passed.[22]
- 1772 – the Somerset v Stewart judgement found that slavery was unsupported by common law in England and Wales.
- 1859 – an essay by the philosopher John Stuart Mill, entitled On Liberty, argued for toleration and individuality. "If any opinion is compelled to silence, that opinion may, for aught we can certainly know, be true. To deny this is to assume our own infallibility."[23][24]
- 1948 – British representatives attempted to but were prevented from adding a legal framework to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. (It was not until 1976 that the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights came into force, giving a legal status to most of the Declaration.)[25]
- 1958 – Two Concepts of Liberty, by Isaiah Berlin, identified "negative liberty" as an obstacle, as distinct from "positive liberty" which promotes self-mastery and the concepts of freedom.[26]
United States[edit]
According to the 1776 United States Declaration of Independence, all people have a natural right to "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness". This declaration of liberty was troubled for 90 years by the continued institutionalization of legalized Black slavery, as slave owners argued that their liberty was paramount since it involved property, their slaves, and that Blacks had no rights that any White man was obliged to recognize. The Supreme Court, in the 1857 Dred Scott decision, upheld this principle. In 1866, after the American Civil War, the US Constitution was amended to extend rights to persons of color, and in 1920 voting rights were extended to women.[27]
By the later half of the 20th century, liberty was expanded further to prohibit government interference with personal choices. In the 1965 United States Supreme Court decision Griswold v. Connecticut, Justice William O. Douglas argued that liberties relating to personal relationships, such as marriage, have a unique primacy of place in the hierarchy of freedoms.[28] Jacob M. Appel has summarized this principle:
In modern America, various competing ideologies have divergent views about how best to promote liberty. Liberals in the original sense of the word see equality as a necessary component of freedom. Progressives stress freedom from business monopoly as essential. Libertarians disagree, and see economic and individual freedom as best. The Tea Party movement sees "big government" as an enemy of freedom.[30][31] Other major participants in the modern American libertarian movement include the Libertarian Party,[32] the Free State Project,[33][34] and the Mises Institute.[35]
France[edit]
France supported the Americans in their revolt against English rule and, in 1789, overthrew their own monarchy, with the cry of "Liberté, égalité, fraternité". The bloodbath that followed, known as the reign of terror, soured many people on the idea of liberty. Edmund Burke, considered one of the fathers of conservatism, wrote "The French had shewn themselves the ablest architects of ruin that had hitherto existed in the world."[36]
Ideologies[edit]
Liberalism[edit]
According to the Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics, liberalism is "the belief that it is the aim of politics to preserve individual rights and to maximize freedom of choice". But they point out that there is considerable discussion about how to achieve those goals. Every discussion of freedom depends on three key components: who is free, what they are free to do, and what forces restrict their freedom.[37] John Gray argues that the core belief of liberalism is toleration. Liberals allow others freedom to do what they want, in exchange for having the same freedom in return. This idea of freedom is personal rather than political.[38]William Safire points out that liberalism is attacked by both the Right and the Left: by the Right for defending such practices as abortion, homosexuality, and atheism, and by the Left for defending free enterprise and the rights of the individual over the collective.[39]
Libertarianism[edit]
According to the Encyclopædia Britannica, libertarians hold liberty as their primary political value.[40] Their approach to implementing liberty involves opposing any governmental coercion, aside from that which is necessary to prevent individuals from coercing each other.[41]
Libertarianism is guided by the principle commonly known as the Non-Aggression Principle (NAP). The Non-Aggression Principle asserts that aggression against an individual or an individual's property is always an immoral violation of one's life, liberty, and property rights.[42][43] Utilizing deceit instead of consent to achieve ends is also a violation of the Non-Aggression principle. Therefore, under the framework of the Non-Aggression principle, rape, murder, deception, involuntary taxation, government regulation, and other behaviors that initiate aggression against otherwise peaceful individuals are considered violations of this principle.[44] This principle is most commonly adhered to by libertarians. A common elevator pitch for this principle is, "Good ideas don't require force."[45]
Republican liberty[edit]
According to republican theorists of freedom, like the historian Quentin Skinner[46][47] or the philosopher Philip Pettit,[48] one's liberty should not be viewed as the absence of interference in one's actions, but as non-domination. According to this view, which originates in the Roman Digest, to be a liber homo, a free man, means not being subject to another's arbitrary will, that is to say, dominated by another. They also cite Machiavelli who asserted that you must be a member of a free self-governing civil association, a republic, if you are to enjoy individual liberty.[49]
The predominance of this view of liberty among parliamentarians during the English Civil War resulted in the creation of the liberal concept of freedom as non-interference in Thomas Hobbes' Leviathan.[citation needed]
Socialism[edit]
Socialists view freedom as a concrete situation as opposed to a purely abstract ideal. Freedom is a state of being where individuals have agency to pursue their creative interests unhindered by coercive social relationships, specifically those they are forced to engage in as a requisite for survival under a given social system. Freedom thus requires both the material economic conditions that make freedom possible alongside social relationships and institutions conducive to freedom.[50]
The socialist conception of freedom is closely related to the socialist view of creativity and individuality. Influenced by Karl Marx's concept of alienated labor, socialists understand freedom to be the ability for an individual to engage in creative work in the absence of alienation, where "alienated labor" refers to work people are forced to perform and un-alienated work refers to individuals pursuing their own creative interests.[51]
Marxism[edit]
For Karl Marx, meaningful freedom is only attainable in a communist society characterized by superabundance and free access. Such a social arrangement would eliminate the need for alienated labor and enable individuals to pursue their own creative interests, leaving them to develop and maximize their full potentialities. This goes alongside Marx's emphasis on the ability of socialism and communism progressively reducing the average length of the workday to expand the "realm of freedom", or discretionary free time, for each person.[52][53] Marx's notion of communist society and human freedom is thus radically individualistic.[54]
Anarchism[edit]
While many anarchists see freedom slightly differently, all oppose authority, including the authority of the state, of capitalism, and of nationalism.[55] For the Russian revolutionary anarchist Mikhail Bakunin, liberty did not mean an abstract ideal but a concrete reality based on the equal liberty of others. In a positive sense, liberty consists of "the fullest development of all the faculties and powers of every human being, by education, by scientific training, and by material prosperity." Such a conception of liberty is "eminently social, because it can only be realized in society," not in isolation. In a negative sense, liberty is "the revolt of the individual against all divine, collective, and individual authority."[56]
Historical writings on liberty[edit]
- John Locke (1689). Two Treatises of Government: In the Former, the False Principles, and Foundation of Sir Robert Filmer, and His Followers, Are Detected and Overthrown. the Latter Is an Essay Concerning the True Original, Extent, and End of Civil Government. London: Awnsham Churchill.
- Frédéric Bastiat (1850). The Law. Paris: Guillaumin & Co.
- John Stuart Mill (1859). On Liberty. London: John W Parker and Son.
- James Fitzjames Stephen (1874). Liberty, Equality, Fraternity. London: Smith, Elder, & Co.
See also[edit]
You searched for
"HOOD" in the KJV Bible
8 Instances - Page 1 of 1
Expand or Limit Your Search Results:
- Hebrews 7:5 | View whole chapter | See verse in context
- And verily they that are of the sons of Levi, who receive the office of the priesthood, have a commandment to take tithes of the people according to the law, that is, of their brethren, though they come out of the loins of Abraham:
You searched for
"SADDLE" in the KJV Bible
4 Instances - Page 1 of 1 - Sort by Book Order - Feedback
- Leviticus 15:9chapter context similar meaning copy save
- And what saddle soever he rideth upon that hath the issue shall be unclean.
- 1 Kings 13:27chapter context similar meaning copy save
- And he spake to his sons, saying, Saddle me the ass. And they saddled him.
- 1 Kings 13:13chapter context similar meaning copy save
- And he said unto his sons, Saddle me the ass. So they saddled him the ass: and he rode thereon,
- 2 Samuel 19:26chapter context similar meaning copy save
- And he answered, My lord, O king, my servant deceived me: for thy servant said, I will saddle me an ass, that I may ride thereon, and go to the king; because thy servant is lame.
Revelation
Chapter 22
Quat
Quat may refer to:
- Quat (surname), a Chinese surname
- Quaternary ammonium cation, a class of chemical molecules used as a disinfectant, surfactant, drug etc.
- Quaternion, a non-commutative extension of the complex numbers
- Quaternary (disambiguation), referring to four parts, divisions, or sets.
- Khat, an African plant whose leaves are chewed as a stimulant
- Phan Huy Quát, former prime minister of South Vietnam
You searched for
"CAN" in the KJV Bible
213 Instances - Page 1 of 8 - Sort by Book Order - Feedback
- James 3:12chapter context similar meaning copy save
- Can the fig tree, my brethren, bear olive berries? either a vine, figs? so can no fountain both yield salt water and fresh.
- Job 25:4chapter context similar meaning copy save
- How then can man be justified with God? or how can he be clean that is born of a woman?
- Ecclesiastes 2:25chapter context similar meaning copy save
- For who can eat, or who else can hasten hereunto, more than I?
- 2 Samuel 19:35chapter context similar meaning copy save
- I am this day fourscore years old: and can I discern between good and evil? can thy servant taste what I eat or what I drink? can I hear any more the voice of singing men and singing women? wherefore then should thy servant be yet a burden unto my lord the king?
- John 3:4chapter context similar meaning copy save
- Nicodemus saith unto him, How can a man be born when he is old? can he enter the second time into his mother's womb, and be born?
- Psalms 106:2chapter context similar meaning copy save
- Who can utter the mighty acts of the LORD? who can shew forth all his praise?
- Job 41:13chapter context similar meaning copy save
- Who can discover the face of his garment? or who can come to him with his double bridle?
- Psalms 78:20chapter context similar meaning copy save
- Behold, he smote the rock, that the waters gushed out, and the streams overflowed; can he give bread also? can he provide flesh for his people?
- Ezekiel 22:14chapter context similar meaning copy save
- Can thine heart endure, or can thine hands be strong, in the days that I shall deal with thee? I the LORD have spoken it, and will do it.
- Job 38:37chapter context similar meaning copy save
- Who can number the clouds in wisdom? or who can stay the bottles of heaven,
- 1 Timothy 6:16chapter context similar meaning copy save
- Who only hath immortality, dwelling in the light which no man can approach unto; whom no man hath seen, nor can see: to whom be honour and power everlasting. Amen.
- Job 34:29chapter context similar meaning copy save
- When he giveth quietness, who then can make trouble? and when he hideth his face, who then can behold him? whether it be done against a nation, or against a man only:
- Esther 8:6chapter context similar meaning copy save
- For how can I endure to see the evil that shall come unto my people? or how can I endure to see the destruction of my kindred?
- Isaiah 28:20chapter context similar meaning copy save
- For the bed is shorter than that a man can stretch himself on it: and the covering narrower than that he can wrap himself in it.
- Jeremiah 14:22chapter context similar meaning copy save
- Are there any among the vanities of the Gentiles that can cause rain? or can the heavens give showers? art not thou he, O LORD our God? therefore we will wait upon thee: for thou hast made all these things.
- Nahum 1:6chapter context similar meaning copy save
- Who can stand before his indignation? and who can abide in the fierceness of his anger? his fury is poured out like fire, and the rocks are thrown down by him.
- Job 8:11chapter context similar meaning copy save
- Can the rush grow up without mire? can the flag grow without water?
- Matthew 16:3chapter context similar meaning copy save
- And in the morning, It will be foul weather to day: for the sky is red and lowring. O ye hypocrites, ye can discern the face of the sky; but can ye not discern the signs of the times?
- Psalms 89:6chapter context similar meaning copy save
- For who in the heaven can be compared unto the LORD? who among the sons of the mighty can be likened unto the LORD?
- Jeremiah 9:10chapter context similar meaning copy save
- For the mountains will I take up a weeping and wailing, and for the habitations of the wilderness a lamentation, because they are burned up, so that none can pass through them; neither can men hear the voice of the cattle; both the fowl of the heavens and the beast are fled; they are gone.
- Jeremiah 5:22chapter context similar meaning copy save
- Fear ye not me? saith the LORD: will ye not tremble at my presence, which have placed the sand for the bound of the sea by a perpetual decree, that it cannot pass it: and though the waves thereof toss themselves, yet can they not prevail; though they roar, yet can they not pass over it?
- Philippians 4:13chapter context similar meaning copy save
- I can do all things through Christ which strengtheneth me.
- Amos 3:3chapter context similar meaning copy save
- Can two walk together, except they be agreed?
- Job 41:16chapter context similar meaning copy save
- One is so near to another, that no air can come between them.
- Job 14:4chapter context similar meaning copy save
- Who can bring a clean thing out of an unclean? not one.
- Luke 18:26chapter context similar meaning copy save
- And they that heard it said, Who then can be saved?
- Matthew 23:33chapter context similar meaning copy save
- Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?
- John 3:9chapter context similar meaning copy save
- Nicodemus answered and said unto him, How can these things be?
- Proverbs 20:9chapter context similar meaning copy save
- Who can say, I have made my heart clean, I am pure from my sin?
- Proverbs 6:28chapter context similar meaning copy save
- Can one go upon hot coals, and his feet not be burned?
This is page: 1 of 8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next >
John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum is located in MassachusettsJohn F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum
General information
Location Boston, Suffolk County, Massachusetts, United States
Coordinates 42°18′57.21″N 71°2′2.71″W
Named for John Fitzgerald Kennedy (1917–1963)
Construction started August 1977
Groundbreaking: June 12, 1977
Inaugurated Dedicated on October 20, 1979
Rededicated on October 29, 1993[1]
Cost $20.8 million[2]
Management National Archives and Records Administration
Technical details
Size 10 acres (40,000 m2)
Design and construction
Architect(s) I. M. Pei
Website
jfklibrary.org
The John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum is the presidential library and museum of John Fitzgerald Kennedy (1917–1963), the 35th president of the United States (1961–1963). It is located on Columbia Point in the Dorchester neighborhood of Boston, Massachusetts, next to the University of Massachusetts at Boston, the Edward M. Kennedy Institute for the United States Senate, and the Massachusetts Archives and Commonwealth Museum.
No comments:
Post a Comment