Rachel Reuben from Israel
taught me Hebrew as a child. Reuben also
taught at State and the laughter that she brought to my life was undeniably
laudable as she had been in the 6 Day War in the Middle East.
The staff of her erection
towards the honor of such gave I a reality that San Francisco had lost via the “Party
System”. These partitions that San
Francisco had erected were meant to have come down in the eventual however San
Francisco still only elects the democrat.
The Pelosi Family are democrats, in fact Mrs. Pelosi is currently the ‘Speaker
of the House’ in Washington D.C. and retains herself as such via the job for
which she was elected? What brings one
Speaker of the House to another bench of rest?
Questions are not a harmful resistance and yet in San Francisco it
always has been considered that, and, “that” was called the resistance. On point my mother had a Church at the
Building on O’Farrell and Divisadero that was called a “Cult” and when Reuben
found us her contact brought more than laughter as Reuben told my mother that I
needed to go to Catholic School because San Francisco had Cops.
These funny facts gave
rise to I going to Convent of the Sacred Heart where I met Alex Pelosi. I met other Catholic girls and yet as Mrs.
Pelosi rose to a life of politics it is Alex that comes to mind still. The reason for this delivers easy facts, as I
returned to San Francisco and Reuben’s nightmare came true, the Catholic and
even in spite of me attending their school has ostracized me. How do I feel about being ostracized? I feel as if everything that a Hebrew
(Reuben) said is true, the 6 Day War was inadequate. The holding of the Hill in Israel was the
ongoing war of an ancient religious war between two peoples countries and still
remains as a bone of contention? Reuben
said that where Jesus Christ was crucified and that temple that was said to
have to be torn down is the main course of that delivery of the 6 Day War.
Cause and effect of the
Catholic in San Francisco was yet another war from long ago. These religions that continue to war over
that part of the Middle East have just carried their opinion around the world
to gain support for their side of the war.
To pluralize war and realize that just that one disagreement of god has
brought, delivered and produced more wars than any other conflict is not confusing
and yet again the rivals rally after rally and produce death after death, country
after country and continue to spread their disagreement like a viral disease
that has no end yet.
To discuss the horrors of
the armbands of World War II is a beginning yet I know that the ribbon ‘round
the old Oak Tree will only forest in a Grove of Oranges and all the gravity of
just an apple will be tossed and called rotten.
For sake I will show any average-reader the passing fried tomato as just
yesterday while watching Senate Minority Leader Schumer
screaming about stopping anti-semitism I thought in recognition of his anger I
would post and publish what I see that should be explained. US Senate Minority Leader
Chuck Schumer on Friday said President Donald Trump had
“redefined chutzpah”. Chutzpah!! What needs explanation first is the dance
that the Hebrew does as it is the Alexandria Library that comes to mind and
that brings the book burning that Hitler exercised a real issue to solve the
armbands again. Armbands that the
resident wore of Concentration Camps had two triangles that represent the
pyramid in Egypt which cannot be argued as Moses is in the bible and that story
is self-explainable to the teachings.
The symbol worn by the resident horrors that ran the Concentration Camps
was the dance steps of the upper body of the residents that had to both live
and die in those Concentration Camps. Whether
German, Polish, Italian or not the horrors remain and millions of people fell
to armbands that gave shirts no tassel and yet the bars read the prison of
people fighting each band, community, tribe or neighborhood. As these words, signs, symbols bind to
chutzpah it is the smegma that comes to introduction to understand the circumcised
to make the next horror a decision that separates the party lines or is it just
the lines in the sand again?
Side note: Israel touts regularly that their god's people and I do not argue with their determination nor their ministry however the Catholic also have a god and therefor there gods people, the Christian also have a god and there gods people, India has many gods and they are gods people. Round the world and you will discover that the teachings are different, the gods are different as proven by Greece and the Museum pieces held only at the Louvre for example and easy lecture and that makes logic reason for any employment of just Israel to apologize to the World at-large as gods people are everywhere and not only selected as Israel has taught for thousands of years bringing to term Benjamin Netanyahu and his country are hurtful to human being's not deadly or found to be murderers as their just stubborn and may prove to be only under the criminal task of narrow mindedness. This is a crime of method but has never produced more than isolated people trying desperately to find their source and origin for being without the critical involvement of every other criminal mind killing them for singing, dancing and practicing separatism. Israel does not want to make more tribes, their language is difficult and normally not taught as that would not be holding to their tradition of separatists. The Christian spreads 'The Word' whereas the Israelite does not and the Catholic never invites anyone to join as you are either born Catholic or marry Catholic, the end.
Mar 9, 2019 - Senate minority leader fumes: When neo-Nazis marched in Charlottesville in front of a synagogue and said ‘burn it down,’ president said ‘both sides’ are to blame.
Chutzpah
From
Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For other uses, see Chutzpah
(disambiguation).
Chutzpah (/ˈhʊtspə, ˈxʊt-/)[1][2] is the quality of audacity, for good or for bad. It derives from
the Hebrew word ḥutspâ (חֻצְפָּה), meaning
"insolence", "cheek" or "audacity". Thus the
original Yiddish word has a strongly negative connotation but the form which
entered English through Ameridish has taken on a broader meaning, having
been popularized through vernacular use in film, literature, and television.
The word is sometimes interpreted—particularly in business parlance—as meaning
the amount of courage, mettle or ardor that an individual has.[citation needed]
Contents
- 1 Etymology
- 2 Chutzpah in Rabbinical literature
- 3 Contemporary usage
- 4 See also
- 5 References
- 6 External links
Etymology
In Hebrew, chutzpah is used indignantly, to describe someone who has
overstepped the boundaries of accepted behavior. In traditional usage, the word
expresses a strong sense of disapproval, condemnation and outrage.
Leo Rosten in The Joys of Yiddish
defines chutzpah as "gall, brazen nerve, effrontery, incredible 'guts',
presumption plus arrogance such as no other word and no other language can do
justice to". In this sense, chutzpah expresses both strong
disapproval and condemnation. In the same work, Rosten also defines the term as
"that quality enshrined in a man who, having killed his mother and father,
throws himself on the mercy of the court because he is an orphan". Chutzpah
amounts to a total denial of personal responsibility, which renders others
speechless and incredulous ... one cannot quite believe that another person
totally lacks common human traits like remorse, regret, guilt, sympathy and
insight. The implication is at least some degree of psychopathy in the subject, as well as the
awestruck amazement of the observer at the display.
The cognate of chutzpah in Classical Arabic, ḥaṣāfah
(حصافة), does not mean "impudence"
or "cheekiness" or anything similar, but rather "sound
judgment".[3]
Chutzpah
in Rabbinical literature
Rabbi Harold M. Schulweis
distinguishes the meaning of chutzpah as stubbornness and contrariness
from what he calls a tradition of "spiritual audacity" or "chutzpah
klapei shmaya":
We
are conventionally raised to believe that Jewish faith demands unwavering
obedience to the law and the law-giver. That attitude tends to cultivate a
temperament of compliance and passivity, For conventional thinking,
"talking back to God" smacks of heresy. But a significant genre of
religious, moral and spiritual audacity toward the divine authority—"chutzpah
klapei shmaya"—finds a place of honor in Jewish religious thought.[4]
As an example, Schulweis cites a
case where Moses argues with God about the justice of His commands:
For
Moses, that God should "visit the iniquity
of the fathers upon the children to the third and fourth generation"
(Exod. 20:5) is an unacceptable form of group punishment akin to the morally
indiscriminate punishment of Sodom. Challenging God's pronouncement of the
punishment of the sons for the sins of the fathers, Moses argues with God,
against God, and in the name of God. Moses engages God with fierce moral logic:
Sovereign
of the Universe, consider the righteousness of Abraham and the idol worship of
his father Terach. Does it make moral sense to punish the child for the
transgressions of the father? Sovereign of the Universe, consider the righteous
deeds of King Hezekiah, who sprang from the loins of his evil father King
Achaz. Does Hezekiah deserve Achaz's punishment? Consider the nobility of King
Josiah, whose father Amnon was wicked. Should Josiah inherit the punishment of
Amnon? (Num. Rabbah, Hukkat XIX, 33)
Trained
to view God as an unyielding authoritarian proclaiming immutable commands, we
might expect that Moses will be severely chastised for his defiance. Who is
this finite, errant, fallible, human creature to question the explicit command
of the author of the Ten Commandments? The divine response to Moses, according
to the rabbinic moral imagination, is arresting:
By
your life Moses, you have instructed Me. Therefore I will nullify My words and
confirm yours. Thus it is said, "The fathers shall not be put to death for
the children, neither shall the children be put to death for the fathers."
(Deut. 24:16)[5]
Contemporary
usage
Judge Alex Kozinski and Eugene Volokh in an article entitled Lawsuit Shmawsuit,
note the rise in use of Yiddish words in legal opinion. They note that chutzpah
has been used 231 times in American legal opinions, 220 of those after 1980.[6] "Chutzpah" first appeared in
a Supreme Court decision in 1998, in National
Endowment for the Arts v. Finley, when Justice Antonin Scalia used
it to describe the NEA's brazenness in asking for government funding. [7]
In the movie Haider (2014) by Vishal Bharadwaj, a modern-day
interpretation of Hamlet set against the backdrop of Kashmir in the midst of
political conflict, the protagonist uses the word chutzpah which they pronounce
as /'tʃʊtspə/
instead of /ˈhʊtspə/ or /ˈxʊtspə/
to describe India's way of treating the people of Kashmir since the beginning
of the conflict. This pronunciation sounds more like Indian slang.
The Polish word "hucpa"
(pronounced [ˈxut͜spa]) is also derived from this term, although its meaning is
closer to "insolence" or "arrogance", and so it is
typically used in a more negative sense instead of denoting a positive
description of someone's audacity.
Similarly, the German form of
chutzpah is "chuzpe".
See
also
References
·
"חוצפה chutzpah".
dictionary.reference.com.
·
· Wehr, Hans (1994) [1979]. J. Milton Cowan, ed. Dictionary
of Modern Written Arabic. Urbana, Illinois: Spoken Language Services, Inc. ISBN 0-87950-003-4.
·
· Kozinski, Alex; Eugene Volokh (1993). "Lawsuit
Shmawsuit". Yale Law Journal. The Yale Law Journal Company,
Inc. 103 (2): 463. doi:10.2307/797101.
JSTOR 797101.
Retrieved 2007-06-24.
7. · Joyce Eisenberg and Ellen Scolnic, "The
Whole Spiel: Funny essays about digital nudniks, seder selfies and chicken soup
memories," Incompra Press, 2016; p. 118. ISBN 978-0-69272625-9
External
links
 |
Look up chutzpah
in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
|
Navigation
menu
- Not logged in
- Talk
- Contributions
- Create account
- Log in
Search
- Main page
- Contents
- Featured content
- Current events
- Random article
- Donate to Wikipedia
- Wikipedia store
Interaction
Tools
- What links here
- Related changes
- Upload file
- Special pages
- Permanent link
- Page information
- Wikidata item
- Cite this page
Print/export
Languages
- This page was last edited on 14 November 2018, at 07:44 (UTC).
- Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
.jpg)
No comments:
Post a Comment